<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I ♥ Shark</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.vlad1.com/2008/01/16/i-%e2%99%a5-shark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.vlad1.com/2008/01/16/i-%e2%99%a5-shark/</link>
	<description>Words</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 12:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tobu</title>
		<link>http://blog.vlad1.com/2008/01/16/i-%e2%99%a5-shark/#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>Tobu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vlad1.com/2008/01/16/i-%e2%99%a5-shark/#comment-207</guid>
		<description>I think we really need a memory profiler.

Firefox trunk alone is not bad (except for very aggressive caching, I guess fbcache retains a lot of memory), but extensions authors and possibly some webapps would really benefit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we really need a memory profiler.</p>
<p>Firefox trunk alone is not bad (except for very aggressive caching, I guess fbcache retains a lot of memory), but extensions authors and possibly some webapps would really benefit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
