<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TraceMonkey: Coming To A Pocket Near You</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.vlad1.com/2008/09/11/tracemonkey-coming-to-a-pocket-near-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.vlad1.com/2008/09/11/tracemonkey-coming-to-a-pocket-near-you/</link>
	<description>Words</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://blog.vlad1.com/2008/09/11/tracemonkey-coming-to-a-pocket-near-you/#comment-2960</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 13:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vlad1.com/?p=94#comment-2960</guid>
		<description>This is great, but when was Javascript performance ever the bottleneck? How many people raytrace, crunch fractals or do 3d in Javascript on their mobile devices? Sure, this helps, but it's avoiding the main problem and perception of slowness in browsers for the vast majority of users: rendering speed. It's not how fast the javascript is that's important, the majority of time is taken up reflowing, redrawing and composing the page after the Javascript has modified the DOM.
And the much promised speedups in Cairo don't seem to be materializing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is great, but when was Javascript performance ever the bottleneck? How many people raytrace, crunch fractals or do 3d in Javascript on their mobile devices? Sure, this helps, but it&#8217;s avoiding the main problem and perception of slowness in browsers for the vast majority of users: rendering speed. It&#8217;s not how fast the javascript is that&#8217;s important, the majority of time is taken up reflowing, redrawing and composing the page after the Javascript has modified the DOM.<br />
And the much promised speedups in Cairo don&#8217;t seem to be materializing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tobu</title>
		<link>http://blog.vlad1.com/2008/09/11/tracemonkey-coming-to-a-pocket-near-you/#comment-2938</link>
		<dc:creator>Tobu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 22:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vlad1.com/?p=94#comment-2938</guid>
		<description>There are now official x86_64 trunk builds, which is enough for me.

I've compared Dromaeo results, it seems x86_64 doesn't really use tracemonkey:

http://dromaeo.com/?id=42043,42046

(Clean profile, cautiously doing a restart for the change to javascript.options.jit.content to take effect)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are now official x86_64 trunk builds, which is enough for me.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve compared Dromaeo results, it seems x86_64 doesn&#8217;t really use tracemonkey:</p>
<p><a href="http://dromaeo.com/?id=42043,42046" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/dromaeo.com');" rel="nofollow">http://dromaeo.com/?id=42043,42046</a></p>
<p>(Clean profile, cautiously doing a restart for the change to javascript.options.jit.content to take effect)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: suihkulokki</title>
		<link>http://blog.vlad1.com/2008/09/11/tracemonkey-coming-to-a-pocket-near-you/#comment-2930</link>
		<dc:creator>suihkulokki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 16:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vlad1.com/?p=94#comment-2930</guid>
		<description>Quite impressive :) Does tracemonkey detect the presence of VFP runtime or does one need to compile different versions of fennec for VFP/softfloat systems?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite impressive :) Does tracemonkey detect the presence of VFP runtime or does one need to compile different versions of fennec for VFP/softfloat systems?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Blizzard &#187; Blog Archive &#187; mobile / arm tracemonkey first numbers</title>
		<link>http://blog.vlad1.com/2008/09/11/tracemonkey-coming-to-a-pocket-near-you/#comment-2921</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Blizzard &#187; Blog Archive &#187; mobile / arm tracemonkey first numbers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 20:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vlad1.com/?p=94#comment-2921</guid>
		<description>[...] has been doing some of the integration work to get TraceMonkey working on ARM. He&#8217;s posted a first set of performance numbers which are more or less in line with the x86 numbers that were originally posted. Here&#8217;s the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has been doing some of the integration work to get TraceMonkey working on ARM. He&#8217;s posted a first set of performance numbers which are more or less in line with the x86 numbers that were originally posted. Here&#8217;s the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RyanVM</title>
		<link>http://blog.vlad1.com/2008/09/11/tracemonkey-coming-to-a-pocket-near-you/#comment-2919</link>
		<dc:creator>RyanVM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 16:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vlad1.com/?p=94#comment-2919</guid>
		<description>Nanojit is supported for x86-64. Firefox doesn't officially-support x86-64 builds, however.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nanojit is supported for x86-64. Firefox doesn&#8217;t officially-support x86-64 builds, however.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thales</title>
		<link>http://blog.vlad1.com/2008/09/11/tracemonkey-coming-to-a-pocket-near-you/#comment-2915</link>
		<dc:creator>Thales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 05:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vlad1.com/?p=94#comment-2915</guid>
		<description>Vladimir,

X86-64 is or not supported by nanojit? In Mozillazine forums people say that it is not, and it will not be out soon...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vladimir,</p>
<p>X86-64 is or not supported by nanojit? In Mozillazine forums people say that it is not, and it will not be out soon&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DAvid</title>
		<link>http://blog.vlad1.com/2008/09/11/tracemonkey-coming-to-a-pocket-near-you/#comment-2914</link>
		<dc:creator>DAvid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 03:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vlad1.com/?p=94#comment-2914</guid>
		<description>Wow, that's a lot faster. Nice work.  What was the total seconds scores for both in sunspider?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, that&#8217;s a lot faster. Nice work.  What was the total seconds scores for both in sunspider?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vladimir</title>
		<link>http://blog.vlad1.com/2008/09/11/tracemonkey-coming-to-a-pocket-near-you/#comment-2912</link>
		<dc:creator>vladimir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 01:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vlad1.com/?p=94#comment-2912</guid>
		<description>Speedups over Mozilla's current JS engine, with tracing disabled — that is, a "5" means "5x faster than the current JS engine without tracing."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speedups over Mozilla&#8217;s current JS engine, with tracing disabled — that is, a &#8220;5&#8243; means &#8220;5x faster than the current JS engine without tracing.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://blog.vlad1.com/2008/09/11/tracemonkey-coming-to-a-pocket-near-you/#comment-2911</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 01:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vlad1.com/?p=94#comment-2911</guid>
		<description>What does the X scale represent on the graphs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does the X scale represent on the graphs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
